Why Restaurants Didn’t Shut Down in the Previous Pandemic

What the city can learn from 1918

Kathleen Squires
Heated

--

Wide-angle shot of the entrance to Delmonico’s, a skinny building flanked on either side by 1-way streets and skyscrapers.
Photo: Rob Kim/Getty Images

New York City is scared. A vicious virus is alarming scientists, baffling the government, and rapidly claiming lives throughout the five boroughs. There’s a ban on handshaking. People are encouraged to wear masks. Citizens are expected to avoid crowds and stay home if sick. Despite these measures, however, thousands are dying.

Meanwhile, the Commissioner of Health is celebrating his birthday inside a fancy restaurant in Columbus Circle. Dr. Royal S. Copeland is enjoying a broiled squab along with a special dance performance given in his honor. The public will read about it in the newspaper the next day and will not be outraged…because it is 1918, and amid the Spanish flu pandemic, restaurants are open: a marked difference from 2020, when New Yorkers are forbidden to dine inside restaurants for months because of Covid-19, even as the city moves into Phase 4 of reopening.

Historians have several explanations as to why the city didn’t shut down restaurants 102 years ago. “Restaurants were considered even more of an ‘essential business,’ especially for those who lived in boarding houses or in kitchenless studios,” says Rebecca Spang, author of The Invention of the Restaurant. Pushcarts provided “takeout,” but delivery didn’t exist. Dining out…

--

--

Responses (2)